Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.
Table of Contents
- Recommendation and Approval Statement
- Executive Summary
- 1. COSEWIC Species Assessment Information
- 2. Species Status Information
- 3. Species Information
- 4. Threats
- 5. Management Objective
- 6. Broad Strategies and Conservation Measures
- 7. Measuring Progress
- 8. References
- Appendix A: Effects on the environment and other species
- Appendix B: Occurrences of Hill’s Pondweed in Canada
- Appendix C: Detailed Characteristics of Hill’s Pondweed Habitat
© Jarmo Jalava
Parks Canada Agency. 2012. Management Plan for Hill's Pondweed (Potamogeton hillii) in Canada [Proposed]. Species at Risk Act Management Plan Series. Parks Canada Agency, Ottawa. v + 23 pp.
For copies of the management plan, or for additional information on species at risk, including COSEWIC Status Reports, residence descriptions, action plans, and other related recovery documents, please visit the Species at Risk Public Registry.
Cover illustration: Photo by Jarmo Jalava. This photo may not be used separately from this document without his written permission.
Également disponible en français sous le titre
« Plan de gestion du potamot de Hill (Potamogeton hillii) au Canada »
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of the Environment, 2012. All rights reserved.
Catalogue no. En3-5/36-2012E-PDF
Content (excluding the illustrations) may be used without permission, with appropriate credit to the source.
Recommendation and Approval Statement
The Parks Canada Agency led the development of this federal management strategy, working together with the other competent minister for this species under the Species at Risk Act. The Chief Executive Officer, upon recommendation of the relevant Park Superintendent and Field Unit Superintendent, hereby approves this document indicating that Species at Risk Act requirements related to management plan development have been fulfilled in accordance with the Act.
Superintendent, Bruce Peninsula National Park and Fathom Five National Marine Park, Parks Canada Agency
Kim St. Claire
Field Unit Superintendent, Georgian Bay, Parks Canada Agency
Chief Executive Officer, Parks Canada Agency
Under the Species at Risk Act (S.C. 2002, c.29) (SARA), the federal competent ministers are responsible for the preparation of management plans for listed species of special concern and are required to report on progress within five years. The federal, provincial, and territorial government signatories under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk (1996) agreed to establish complementary legislation and programs that provide for effective protection of species at risk throughout Canada.
The Minister of the Environment and the Minister responsible for the Parks Canada Agency is the competent minister under SARA for the Hill’s Pondweed and has prepared this management plan as per section 65 of SARA. It has been prepared in cooperation with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, including Ontario Parks, First Nations, local government and non-government organizations, and independent experts.
Success in the management of this species depends on the commitment and cooperation of many different constituencies that will be involved in implementing the directions set out in this strategy and will not be achieved by Parks Canada Agency and Environment Canada, or any other jurisdiction, alone. All Canadians are invited to join in supporting and implementing this strategy for the benefit of the Hill’s Pondweed and Canadian society as a whole.
Implementation of this strategy is subject to appropriations, priorities, and budgetary constraints of the participating jurisdictions and organizations.
The original draft of this management plan was prepared by Judith Jones, Winter Spider Eco-Consulting, and Jarmo Jalava, Consulting Ecologist. The draft was updated by Gary Allen and Stephen McCanny (Parks Canada, Ontario Service Centre), with reviews and advice provided during the internal review of the document by Jeff Truscott and Cavan Harpur at Bruce Peninsula National Park, and by Kara Vlasman at Parks Canada National Office. Thanks are also due to the following individuals whose review comments and suggestions served to improve the scientific accuracy and utility of this document in preparation for posting: Anthony Chegahno (Chippewas of Nawash First Nation), Amelia Argue and Eric Snyder (Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources SAR Branch), Meghan Gerson, Rachel deCatanzaro, Tania Morais, and Elizabeth Rezek (Environment Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service – Ontario), and Jarmo Jalava. Access to element occurrence data at the Natural Heritage Information Centre (NHIC) was facilitated by Martina Furrer and Jim Mackenzie.
The Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada designated Hill's Pondweed (Potamogeton hillii) as Special Concern in 1986 and confirmed this status in 2005. The species is listed as Special Concern on the federal Species at Risk Act (SARA). In Ontario, it is listed as Special Concern on the Species at Risk in Ontario (SARO) List under the Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA 2007). The global rank of Hill's Pondweed is vulnerable, and it is identified as rare in all nine U.S. states in which it occurs.
Hill's Pondweed is a slender, entirely submerged aquatic plant, with linear leaves. Linear-leaved pondweeds are difficult to identify without fruit present, and Hill's Pondweed may easily be confused with other species when sterile.
The Canadian range of the species is restricted to Ontario, where it occurs from Manitoulin Island in the north, south through the Bruce Peninsula; with a few sites in southwestern Ontario. The total number of sites may be as many as 33 if all sites are found to be extant, or as few as 26 if sites where Hill’s Pondweed was not found in 2003-2008 are in fact extirpated. However, it is most likely that Hill’s Pondweed will be found at some of these sites with further field study. With eight of the 26 known extant Canadian populations of Hill’s Pondweed within Bruce Peninsula National Park, Parks Canada has a high responsibility for the management of this species.
Hill’s Pondweed occurs in cold, clear, alkaline water, such as in channels in wetlands, small streams, ponds, muddy substrate, and where water collects. Rarely is it found in turbid or polluted waters, or in open lakes, or in water deeper than 1.5 metres.
Intrinsic factors may limit Hill's Pondweed including: low levels of beaver activity, low pollination success, and natural changes in water clarity or water level. There is little information on threats affecting Hill's Pondweed. Documented threats include: invasive species, road construction and maintenance, and changes in water chemistry or flow.
The management objective for Hill's Pondweed is to maintain populations and habitat at their current distribution and number of occurrences for the next ten years, or until reassessed as Not at Risk by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC), and that assessment is accepted by the Minister. As the species tends to occupy successional habitats, management should be directed at the watershed level, with the goal of retaining high quality, pollution-free aquatic systems. The objectives will be met by: working with agencies that have responsibility for wetlands; direct actions on invasive species; increased public awareness of the species and communicating best management practices; working with landowners on stewardship; monitoring trends; and reconfirming known sites and surveying potential habitat. Additional survey work is recommended because, as a rather inconspicuous aquatic plant, it is very likely that the species has often been overlooked and may be more widespread than is known. Specific conservation measures and an implementation schedule for these measures, are provided.
1. COSEWIC Species Assessment Information
Date of Assessment: May, 2005
Common Name (population): Hill's Pondweed
Scientific Name: Potamogeton hillii
COSEWIC Status: Special Concern
Reason for Designation: An inconspicuous, rooted, aquatic plant currently known from fewer than 20 Canadian populations and occupying a very small total area of habitat. No imminent limiting factors have been identified that would have significant impacts on this globally rare species, but invasive exotic plants may be impacting some populations.
Canadian Occurrence: Ontario
COSEWIC Status History: Designated Special Concern in April 1986. Status re-examined and confirmed in May 2005. Last assessment based on an update status report.
2. Species Status Information
Hill's Pondweed is present in nine U.S. states and in Ontario (Figure 2). The species is rare in all jurisdictions where it is found. It is globally ranked G3, nationally ranked N3 in the U.S., and N2 in Canada. In Canada, the species is listed as Special Concern under both the federal Species at Risk Act (2002) and Ontario’s Endangered Species Act, 2007. Table 1 summarizes the conservation status ranks for the species.
1--critically imperilled, 2--imperilled, 3--vulnerable, 4--apparently secure, and 5--secure.
3. Species Information
3.1 Species Description
Hill's Pondweed (Figure 1) is a slender, submerged aquatic plant, green to olive-green in colour, with stems generally 30-60 cm long and 0.5-1.0 mm wide. The leaves are linear, 2-6 cm long and 1-2.5 mm wide (4 mm maximum), with 3 parallel veins, a tiny bristle (mucro) at the tip, and 1-2 rows of transparent air cells (lacunae) along the midvein. This species does not produce wide, floating leaves. The stipules (leaf-like tissue where the leaf stalk meets the stem) are delicate, 7-16 mm long, not fused to the leaf stalk, and only slightly shredding at the tip. In July, flowers are borne in small, nearly globose clusters (spikes) 4-7 mm long, which are held just above the water surface on short, recurved stalks 1.0-1.5 cm long. The seed-like fruits are 2-4 mm long with 3 low ridges or keels and are usually present in August and September. Reproduction is largely vegetative, often by stem fragmentation or by winter buds (turions) that detach from the plant (Hellquist 1984).
Linear-leaved pondweeds are difficult to identify when fruit are not present. Given this, a conclusive identification of pondweeds should not be expected without the fertile parts of the plant. Hill's Pondweed is easily confused with Potamogeton pusillus, P. foliosus, P. friesii, P. strictifolius, or P. ogdenii. Hill's Pondweed is characterized by fruit clusters on short stalks which arise from the leaf axils, and fruits with 3 low keels or ridges. The fruits of P. hillii are larger than those of the closely related P. foliosus. As well, the bristle on the leaf tip of P. hillii separates it from sterile P. foliosus, where the leaf tips are merely acute. P. strictifolius may also form bristle-tipped leaves, but has a bold leaf margin formed from prominent veins and distinct nodal glands (Hellquist 1984).
Hill's Pondweed can be separated from other species of pondweed by these characters (See especially Hellquist 1984, Cronquist 1991, or Voss 1972):
- Leaves narrow, linear, 3-veined
- Leaves bristle-tipped with rows of air cells along the mid-vein
- Fruit cluster small, few-flowered, sub-globose,
- Fruits, with 3 low keels or ridges
- Fruit stalk (peduncle) short, arising from leaf axils
- Stipules free from the leaf stalk
- Stipules only slightly shredding at the tips.
Figure 1. Hill's Pondweed (centre, submerged)--general aspect (J. Jalava 2008).
© Jarmo Jalava
3.2 Populations and Distribution
Figure 2. Global range of Hill's Pondweed (stippled areas show generalized regions). No information was available on locations in Virginia.
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada
According to NatureServe (2012), there are 87 documented element occurrences (EOs), and likely over 100 actual occurrences range-wide. Given the difficulties of identifying the species and accessing its submerged wetland habitat, it is likely that the species is often overlooked and may be more widespread than is known.
In Ontario, Hill's Pondweed occurs from Manitoulin Island in the north, south through the Bruce Peninsula; with a few sites in southwestern Ontario (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Canadian distribution of Hill's Pondweed.
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada
Habitat for Hill's Pondweed is associated with dolostone (Hellquist, 1984), so potential habitat may be found in Ontario wetlands along the Niagara Escarpment and Precambrian contact line (Brownell 1986).
This species has never been known to be common in Ontario. COSEWIC (2005) reports a total of 22 element occurrences (EOs) of Hill’s Pondweed, but the status of many of these sites remains uncertain. Prior to 2003, there were 19 records for extant sites, although many had not been revisited for a long time. Between 2003 and 2008, 13 of those sites were reconfirmed to be extant, three are now presumed extirpated (St. Thomas in Elgin County, and two sites on the Bruce Peninsula: Little Eagle Harbour and Albermarle Brook/Hope Bay), and seven others have inconclusive field work or need further surveys to confirm species presence or extirpation1 (five of these sites are now considered historical, as there have been no observations in 20 years). As well, three new sites were found in 2002-2003, and 10 new sites were found in 2006-2008. The total number of sites may be as many as 33 if all known sites are found to be extant, or as few as 26 if sites where Hill’s Pondweed was not found in 2003-2008 are in fact extirpated. However, it is most likely that Hill’s Pondweed will be found at some of these sites, with further work.
A list of all known sites showing ownership, most recent observation, available abundance data, and individual population status, is provided in Appendix B2. Abundance is very difficult to quantify for this species. Individual stems are hard to count since the plants are submerged and can be growing in large, dense, clonal patches, sometimes mixed with other linear-leaved pondweeds. Although this is a perennial species, numbers of plants at any one site may vary considerably from year to year depending on conditions (COSEWIC 2005; Brownell 1986). Makkay (COSEWIC 2005) estimated numbers of plants to the nearest 100, but an estimate of occupied area in square metres (Jalava pers. comm. 2012) is easier to make and sometimes may be more useful. The most recent COSEWIC status update report (COSEWIC 2005), estimated the Ontario population at 119,600 individuals, but this total uses data from only 12 sites. Therefore, it is entirely possible that the actual size of the population of Hill's Pondweed in Ontario may be more than double this number (with the caveat that the population totals would include a clonal component).
3.3 Needs of the Hill's Pondweed
3.3.1 Habitat and Biological Needs
Hill’s Pondweed occurs in cold, clear, alkaline water. It can be found in channels in open wetlands; in small slow-moving streams, ponds, and beaver ponds with muddy substrate; around springs and small inlets in ponds or marshes; and where water collects, such as above beaver dams and road culverts. It can be found in beaver draw-downs (in the shallow pools left on the upstream side after a dam has broken). Rarely is it found in turbid or polluted waters, or in open lakes, or in water deeper than 1.5 m (Hellquist 1984). Fieldwork for this species on the Bruce Peninsula (Brinker 2007; Jalava 2009) often located Hill's Pondweed habitat within dynamic wetland systems with natural disturbance from beaver activity. Wetlands subjected to beaver activity undergo various phases of development and successional stages; thus it has been suggested that Hill's Pondweed does not appear to persist in one locality over a long period (Mitchell and Sheviak 1981 cited in Brownell 1986; NatureServe 2012). However, field work in Ontario shows that some populations have persisted at the same site for at least 30 years. It is not known if particular water levels or successional stages are required for germination or reproduction of the species.
The alkalinity of the water is an extremely important factor in the distribution of Hill's Pondweed. Hellquist (1980) examined the levels of dissolved calcium carbonate (CaCO3) in water at 35 sites and found Hill's Pondweed occurs where dissolved CaCO3 ranged from 53.0 to 290.0 mg per litre with a mean of 124.1 mg per litre. As well, 79% of Hill's Pondweed sites coincided with dolomitic limestone bedrock, which is presumed to be the source of the alkalinity.
Brinker (2007) noted that the majority of populations were in wetlands with fairly recent disturbance histories, often with natural disturbance dynamics from beaver activity, and with little to moderate amounts of shrub or tree cover. All had dead standing woody snags, suggesting altered flood dynamics, and a high incidence of graminoid cover. Scattered tree cover was often less than 10%. Virtually all sites found during fieldwork on the Bruce Peninsula in 2008 (Jalava 2009) had frequent standing dead snags, fallen dead trees, marshy areas and, usually, very slowly flowing water of a stream or brook. Occasional populations were in motionless pools. Details on typical associate species, and examples of where habitat occurs, are presented in Appendix C, to assist future workers in recognizing and searching suitable habitat.
3.3.2 Ecological Role
Hill's Pondweed sometimes forms dense colonies, and thus may provide cover and surface area for small aquatic organisms (insects, snails, etc.), amphibians, and possibly fishes. These species in turn provide food for larger animals. Vegetative parts, and especially seeds of pondweeds in general, are a very significant food source for waterfowl, muskrats, and other vegetarian animals (Martin and Uhler 1939 cited in COSEWIC 1986).
Seeds of Hill's Pondweed are probably dispersed by waterfowl, as well as by the mechanical movements of the plants from wind and water. According to Haynes (1978), waterfowl eat pondweed seeds but digest only the outermost and middle layers of the seed, leaving the inner layer surrounding the seed intact. A high percentage of germination was shown for seeds that have passed through waterfowl gut (Brownell 1986).
Little is known about pollination in this species. Flower spikes in Hill's Pondweed are held at or below the water surface, so presumably pollen is transferred by wind or water. According to Haynes (1978), dragonflies have been observed to land on some the flower spikes of some species of pondweeds, but there is little evidence that pollen transfer is actually accomplished by any insect.
If wetlands where Hill's Pondweed occurs are found to have successional dynamics, it could be speculated that Hill's Pondweed may be a colonizer of early successional areas (e.g., open water or muck), and that its growth and eventual density may play a role in helping other species become established. Dense populations may play a minor role in reducing water flow in brooks, streams, and wetlands channels.
3.3.3 Limiting Factors
A number of intrinsic factors may limit Hill's Pondweed, but so far none have been studied. A list of possible factors could include: a lack of (or changes in) beaver activity, low pollination success with low levels of out-crossing leading to low fruit production, and natural changes in water clarity or water level.
As well, if habitat for Hill's Pondweed is within early successional stages that eventually become unsuitable from increased vegetation, then the species must be able to disperse seed to new, early successional habitats in order to remain present within the landscape. Such long-distance dispersal could be a limiting factor, but again this has not been studied. The ability to produce sufficient seed to attract dispersal agents (possibly waterfowl) could also be a limitation. These potential limiting factors require study to determine their impact on this species.
4.1 Threat Assessment
Threats are defined as the proximate (human) activities or processes that have caused, are causing, or may cause the destruction, degradation, and/or impairment, of biodiversity and natural processes. Threats can be past (historical), ongoing, or likely to occur in the future. Threats do not include intrinsic biological features of the species or populations such as inbreeding depression, small population size, or genetic isolation, which are considered limiting factors.
There is very little specific information on what threats may be affecting individual populations or how severe the effects might be. Most information on threats reported in the literature or from recent field work is merely speculative. At this point, it is not possible to assess anything more than whether or not a threat has been reported to be present (Table 2). The listed threats may be potential threats to any Hill's Pondweed population.
4.2 Description of Threats
Little information on threats was presented in either the 1986 COSEWIC report (Brownell 1986) or the 2005 COSEWIC report, due to the dearth of systematic monitoring; other than references to change over time, e.g. degradation by cattle at one site (Black Creek, Manitoulin Island), or ascendance of the exotic Curly Pondweed (Potamogeton crispus), and competition with Hill’s Pondweed at another site (Bethel Creek, Wellington County). Other potential threats were listed generally as draining of ponds or wetlands, and loss of water quality from chemical or thermal pollution.
Jalava (2009) noted that the major threat to Hill's Pondweed on the Bruce Peninsula was road maintenance and widening, and this threat appeared to have severely impacted or possibly extirpated Hill’s Pondweed from one site. Winter road salt, pesticide use for road maintenance, erosion, deposition of dust, and contamination of water from livestock and septic systems, are additional potential threats to water quality associated with roads. On the other hand, Jalava (2009) noted road building may occasionally create habitat, since road embankments often impound water in a manner similar to beaver dams. Removal of beaver dams could result in loss of habitat for the species. As long as natural processes within watersheds are not significantly interfered with, and water quality remains intact, the species will likely persist. No impacts directly from water pollution were observed in 2008 on the Bruce Peninsula (Jalava 2009).
In the Credit Valley watershed, many factors may be affecting water quality in Hill's Pondweed habitat. The lakes that support Hill's Pondweed are surrounded by cottages, and nutrients from septic systems may be entering the lake, and may possibly be the cause of algal blooms. As well, an aggregates operation and dredging of the outflow channel on one lake may be affecting water levels (Lynn pers. comm. 2009). It is not yet known how this has affected Hill's Pondweed populations.
At the Bethel Creek site (Wellington County), it was suggested that the abundance of Curly Pondweed (P. crispus), a widespread, exotic, may have been instrumental, in part, in replacing Hill's Pondweed, as the species was present in 1978 but could not be refound during a 2003 survey (COSEWIC 2005).
On Manitoulin Island, one population has probably become extirpated due to a change in water quality when the site became the outlet for the sewage treatment system for the town of Mindemoya.
According to Brownell (1986), wetland sites were protected due to their zoning as hazard lands; however, filling in and altering of wetlands continues to be a threat since private landowners may fill in or alter wetlands on their property without scrutiny if no re-zoning or building permit is required for a project.
5. Management Objective
The objective of this management plan is to maintain Hill's Pondweed populations and habitat at current distribution and number of occurrences for the next ten years, or until reassessed as Not at Risk by COSEWIC, and that assessment is accepted by the Minister.
Rationale: In the 2005 COSEWIC assessment, Hill’s Pondweed was designated as Special Concern due to its low number of populations (fewer than 20) and its restriction to a very small total area of habitat. There are currently between 26 and 33 extant populations of the species, and it is believed that three populations are extirpated, with another two considered as possibly extirpated. There is no evidence to suggest that the species was historically more abundant, and there is a good likelihood of additional populations being identified, evidenced by 13 ‘new’ populations having been discovered in the past ten years. With success in additional targeted field surveys, the species is a candidate for reassessment as Not at Risk by COSEWIC.
As the species appears to be particularly sensitive to degradation of its aquatic habitat, the long term objective to maintain populations and habitat at the current distribution and number of occurrences is set to prevent further decline in the number of known populations, or deterioration of the species’ status. The objective is specifically set to not focus on maintaining the species through ‘freezing’ habitat at particular sites, as the species tends to occupy successional habitats, and may not remain at a given site for long periods of time. Rather management should be directed at those watersheds within which the species occurs, with the goal of retaining or enhancing high quality, pollution-free aquatic systems (NatureServe 2012).
6. Broad Strategies and Conservation Measures
6.1 Actions Already Completed or Underway
- From 2006 through 2008, Hill’s Pondweed was one of the secondary target species of extensive surveys for species at risk (SAR) occurring in hydro-riparian habitats within the Bruce Peninsula National Park / Fathom Five National Marine Park Greater Ecosystem (Brinker 2007; Jalava 2009). As a result of that study, 10 new sites for Hill’s Pondweed on the Bruce Peninsula were discovered, 5 known sites were reconfirmed, and 2 known sites were not relocated. Managing for SAR is part of the Bruce Peninsula National Park Management Plan (Parks Canada 1998), monitoring programs are being established for all SAR, including Hill’s Pondweed (Kirk et al. 2011), and Parks Canada is responsible for regular reporting on the status of SAR within their properties.
- From 2007 to 2011, SAR inventories and community presentations have been undertaken of the Chippewas of Nawash First Nation and the Saugeen First Nation reserve lands and traditional territories on the Bruce Peninsula. As a result of these studies, community awareness regarding this species has been increased.
- A conservation plan has been done for Green Lake, which supports Hill’s Pondweed, by the Credit Valley Conservation Authority. Although this plan does not deal directly with species at risk, the conservation plan recognizes the importance of maintaining the natural features of the area, which may help to maintain water quality.
6.2 Broad Strategies
The broad strategies for Hill's Pondweed are:
- Work with partners to develop and implement conservation and management measures, to protect habitat.
- Conduct population surveys and monitoring to fill knowledge gaps on the species.
- Increase public awareness of the species and its habitat.
- Reconfirm known sites and survey potential habitat.
Specific steps in achieving the above, and the rationale behind them, are discussed in the following section.
Hill's Pondweed is one of many SAR found in the Bruce Peninsula and Manitoulin Island region. It is recommended that recovery of Hill's Pondweed be coordinated with recovery activities being undertaken for other SAR in the region. This will enable the best use of resources and personnel and will be very important in keeping the public engaged and informed on target species. Recovery efforts for Hill's Pondweed in the Bruce Peninsula and Manitoulin Island region will be achieved by cooperative efforts amongst those that have direct responsibility for wetlands, including Bruce County, the member municipalities, conservation authorities, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, planning boards, Ontario Parks, First Nations, Bruce County Stewardship Council, private landowners, and Parks Canada. Threats to Hill's Pondweed should be addressed by these partners via management planning, by adoption and communication of best management practices, e.g. for maintenance of roads through sensitive wetland systems, and through judicious control of beavers as one of the drivers in healthy, aquatic ecosystems.
In southwestern Ontario, threats to Hill's Pondweed should be addressed by the appropriate planning agencies, e.g. Credit Valley Conservation Authority, in their watershed management and site-specific conservation plans, and the municipalities in their respective plans, as well as by communicating best management practices for development and activities adjacent to or in water.
6.3 Conservation Measures
|Broad Strategies||Conservation Measures||Priority3||Threats or concerns|
|1. Work with partners to develop and implement conservation and management measures, to protect habitat.||1. Identify planning and conservation agencies that work in the area of known populations.||High||Any or all||Complete by 2014|
|1. Work with partners to develop and implement conservation and management measures, to protect habitat.||2. Assess presence of invasive species at Hill's Pondweed sites.||Medium||Invasive species||Complete by 2017|
|2. Conduct population surveys and monitoring to fill knowledge gaps on the species.||3. Conduct surveys to verify the presence of Hill's Pondweed at locations which need reconfirmation or additional field work.||High||Low number of populations; declining trends||Complete by 2015|
|3. Increase public awareness of the species and its habitat.||4. Identify key private landowners; depending on the number of people involved, plan and implement appropriate contact and communication.||High||Any or all||Begin by 2014|
|3. Increase public awareness of the species and its habitat.||5. Include information on Hill's Pondweed in the nature-oriented sections of the websites of the Credit Valley CA and the Town of Caledon.||Low||Any or all||Complete by 2015|
|4. Reconfirm known sites and survey potential habitat.||6. For selected element occurrences in and intersecting with the Bruce Peninsula National Park, assess the presence of the species and potential habitat every five years, per the monitoring protocol developed in 2011 (Kirk et al.).||High||Low number of populations; declining trends||Begin by 2013|
6.4 Narrative to Support Implementation Schedule
6.4.1 Work with partners to develop and implement conservation and management measures to protect habitat
Conservation Measure #1: Identify planning and conservation agencies that work in the area of known populations (e.g., Niagara Escarpment Commission, Town of Caledon, Tehkummah Township, Saugeen First Nation, Chippewas of Nawash First Nation, Township of Northern Bruce Peninsula, Township of Southern Bruce Peninsula, Bruce County, etc.). Make Hill's Pondweed sites known to these agencies and discuss management and protection steps with them.
Performance measure: Information on Hill's Pondweed is received by at least 5 groups or agencies by 2014.
Conservation Measure #2: Assess presence of invasive species at Hill's Pondweed sites. Focus on the one site where Curly Pondweed (P. crispus) is believed to be a threat in possibly extirpating the species (Bethel Creek, Wellington County). Record presence or absence of invasive species at other sites (integrate with field work for Conservation Measure #3).
Rationale: Work is needed to see if or how invasive species are impacting Hill's Pondweed populations (COSEWIC 2005), so that if necessary, management planning can be implemented to improve the situation.
Performance measure: Assessment at one problematic site by 2016. Presence/absence information and an assessment of invasive threat for selected additional sites to be available for 2017.
6.4.2 Conduct surveys and monitoring to fill knowledge gaps on the species
Conservation Measure #3: Conduct surveys to verify the presence of Hill's Pondweed at locations which need reconfirmation or additional field work.
Rationale: In order to plan effective management for this species, a better understanding of its current status and distribution is needed. The species is hard to identify, is inconspicuous, and grows in a habitat that is seldom visited. Therefore, further surveys are needed to see if the species is indeed rare, or rather if it’s perceived rarity is the result of a lack of attention in the field. Surveys are especially important because rationale for the Special Concern designation of Hill's Pondweed is few populations occupying a very small total area of habitat (COSEWIC 2005). It is important to verify if this is indeed the case. This may change the conservation outlook for the species.
Manitoulin Island--4 known sites need reconfirmation; much potential habitat never surveyed;
Performance measure: An evaluation of how many sites exist and whether the species is declining or not will have been made in time for the next COSEWIC review (2015).
6.4.3 Increase public awareness of the species and its habitat
Conservation Measure #4: Identify key private landowners; depending on the number of people involved, plan and implement appropriate contact and communication.
Performance measure: Some communications and outreach products have been developed and landowner contact has begun by 2014.
Conservation Measure #5: Include information on Hill's Pondweed in the nature-oriented sections of the websites of the Credit Valley Conservation Authority and the Town of Caledon.
Performance measure: Accurate information on Hill's Pondweed is readily accessible on the Internet by 2015.
6.4.4 Reconfirm known sites and survey potential habitat
Conservation Measure #6: For selected element occurrences in and intersecting with the Bruce Peninsula National Park, assess the presence of the species and potential habitat every five years, per the monitoring protocol developed in 2011 (Kirk et al.). Adopt the census method utilized by Jalava of estimating occupied area of Hill’s Pondweed in square metres, rather than attempting individual counts.
Rationale: With eight of the 26 known extant Canadian populations of Hill’s Pondweed within Bruce Peninsula National Park, Parks Canada has a high responsibility for the management of this species. The Managed Area Rank is MA2 (Imperilled in the Managed Area because of extreme rarity making it especially vulnerable to extirpation from the Managed Area). The major threat affecting Hill’s Pondweed within the National Park and its Greater Park Ecosystem is road widening and road maintenance (Bastick & Darevic DA July 2011).
Performance measure: Application of monitoring protocol initiated in 2013.
Note: Habitat and population restoration is not currently required as there are many sites and ample suitable habitat. If any action of this type were needed, it would be to augment the area of occupancy at some sites. However, this type of action should not be done until threats to water quality and flow have been assessed, and other management actions to address threats have been undertaken.
7. Measuring Progress
Every five years, success of this management plan implementation will be measured against the following performance indicator:
- No decline in the abundance and distribution of the Canadian population of Hill’s Pondweed.
Bastick, J. and K. Darevic. 2011. Managed Area Element Status Assessment for Hill’s Pondweed at Bruce Peninsula National Park of Canada. Parks Canada. 7pp.
Brinker, S. 2007. Hydro-riparian Species at Risk Inventory – Bruce Peninsula National Park. Prepared for Parks Canada Agency, Bruce Peninsula National Park, Tobermory Ontario. Prepared by Dougan & Associates Ecological Consulting and Design. 84 pp. + appendices.
Brownell, V., 1986. COSEWIC status report on the Hill's Pondweed Potamogeton hill in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 34 pp.
COSEWIC 2005. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the Hill's pondweed Potamogeton hillii in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 19 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm).
Cronquist, A. 1991. Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada, 2nd ed. New York Botanical Garden, 910 pp.
Haynes, R.R. 1978. The Potamogetonaceae in the Southeastern United States. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum, 59(2) 170-191.
Hellquist, C.B. 1984. Observations of Potamogeton hillii Morong in North America. Rhodora 86: 101-111.
Hellquist, C.B. 1980. Correlation of alkalinity and the distribution of Potamogeton in New England. Rhodora 76: 564-649.
Jalava, J.V. 2009. Hydro-riparian Species at Risk Inventory – Bruce Peninsula National Park, Final Report, January 2009. Prepared for Parks Canada Agency, Bruce Peninsula National Park / Fathom Five National Marine Park, Tobermory Ontario. vi + 152 pp.
Jalava, J.V. 2012. Personal communication. Consulting Ecologist, Paisley, Ontario.
Kirk, D.A., J.L. Pearce and H. Bickerton. 2011. Long-term Inventory Program for Species at Risk Reporting for each of the Five Ontario National Parks. Draft report prepared for Parks Canada Agency, Ontario Service Centre. 236pp.
Lynn, H. , 2009. Personal communication. Natural Heritage Ecologist, Credit Valley Conservation Authority.
Makkay, K. 2004. Confidential locality data for Hill's Pondweed. Unpublished data on file with Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa.
Martin, A.C. and F.M. Uhler, 1939. Food of game ducks in the United States and Canada. U.S. Department of Agriculture and Technology Bulletin 634. 156 pp.
Mitchell, R.S. and C. J. Sheviak 1981. Rare plants of New York State. New York State Museum Bulletin 445. Albany, NY 96 pp.
NatureServe. 2012. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 7.0. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Available http://www.natureserve.org/explorer. (Accessed: January 9, 2012).
Noble, T.W., 1995. Site District 5E2 gap analysis (unapproved draft). Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Central Region. Huntsville, ON
Parks Canada 1998. Bruce Peninsula National Park Management Plan. Parks Canada, Tobermory, Ontario, 43 pp.
USDA, NRCS. 2012. The PLANTS Database (http://plants.usda.gov, 9 January 2012). National Plant Data Team, Greensboro, NC 27401-4901 USA.
Voss, E.G. 1972. The Michigan Flora vol. 1. Gymnosperms and Monocots. Cranbrook Institute of Science Bulletin 55, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan. 488 pp.
Appendix A: Effects on the Environment and Other Species
A strategic environmental assessment (SEA) is conducted on all SARA recovery planning documents, in accordance with the Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals. The purpose of a SEA is to incorporate environmental considerations into the development of public policies, plans, and program proposals to support environmentally sound decision-making.
Recovery planning is intended to benefit species at risk and biodiversity in general. However, it is recognized that plans may also inadvertently lead to environmental effects beyond the intended benefits. The planning process based on national guidelines directly incorporates consideration of all environmental effects, with a particular focus on possible impacts upon non-target species or habitats. The results of the SEA are incorporated directly into the plan itself, but are also summarized below.
Effects on other species are expected to be beneficial, and no negative impacts are predicted. The management of Hill's Pondweed will mostly involve policy and outreach steps. As well, since the goal is to maintain existing sites and populations, there will be very little management in the actual habitat. The primary focus will be work to ensure natural, dynamic wetland processes such as variable water levels, beaver activity, successional changes in vegetation, etc. continue to function naturally. Management activities that maintain wetland integrity and water chemistry will benefit many other species in the same habitat.
This management plan will clearly benefit the environment by promoting the conservation of Hill's Pondweed. The potential for the plan to inadvertently lead to adverse effects on other species was considered. The SEA concluded that this plan will clearly benefit the environment and will not entail any significant adverse effects. The reader should refer to the following sections of the document in particular: Conservation Measures (6.3); Habitat and Biological Needs (3.3.1); and Ecological Role (3.3.2).
Appendix B: Occurrences of Hill’s Pondweed in Canada*
Those sites with a Population Status of
“Possibly Extirpated” require further surveys to confirm their status. Sites are not considered extirpated unless they have been unsuccessfully searched more than once in different years, and/or suitable habitat no longer exists at the site. Pop# refers to the number assigned to the known Canadian populations, for tracking purposes within this management plan only.
* The locational information for an additional four extant sites on the northern Bruce Peninsula is considered confidential. These four sites are thus not included in the list below.
NHIC = Natural Heritage Information Centre, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources; KM = Kristina Makkay (COSEWIC 2005); BPNP = Bruce Peninsula National Park; WAT = University of Waterloo Herbarium; n/a = NHIC EO ID # not assigned.
|Pop #||NHIC EO ID - COSEWIC pop #||Location||Ownership||Abundance||Last Obser-|
|Cabot Head – Lindsay Twp||Ontario Parks/ Private|
(has ANSI designation)
|Not found||Jalava, 2008||1993||Possibly Extirpated|
|W of Cameron Lake||Probably private||Not found (possibly extirpated)||Jalava, 2008||~500 plants Makkay 2003; "sparse" Catling & Brownell, 1983||Possibly Extirpated|
|Crane Lake Road||Probably private||Sparse||Brinker 2006||40,000 Makkay 2003||Extant|
|McVicar Swamp & Crane Lake||BPNP/Private||4,000 (Makkay)||Brinker 2006||4,000|
|5||n/a||Cyprus Lake Road||BPNP||Present;|
no info on abundance
|6||92562||Emmett Lake Road||BPNP||Scattered plants||2008||Brinker, 2006||Extant|
|7||n/a||Halfway Dump Road wetland||BPNP||>100||Jalava 2008||none||Extant|
|Hope Bay Forest||Probably private||4m2 patch||Jalava 2008||Larson 1992||Extant|
|9||92559||Johnston Harbour-Pine Tree Point||Probably Crown land||Present;|
no info on abundance
|McLander Marsh||BPNP||~16,000||Makkay 2003||Johnson 1991;|
|11||KM002||NE of Miller Lake||Private||Not found||Jalava 2008|
|~4000 Makkay 2003;||Extant|
|12||3532||Miller Lake (Brinkman's Corner Rd)||Municipal||Abundant||Johnson 2002||none||Extant|
|13||n/a||Sadler Creek||Private||Dense||Wilson 2008||none||Extant|
|Scott Point||Probably private||10,000||Makkay 2003||none||Extant|
|Shingle Marsh||BPNP||~2000||Makkay 2003||Johnson, 1991||Extant|
|16||KM021||Spring Creek||Crown land||Sparse||Jalava 2009||none|
|17||92560||Umbrella Lake & vicinity||BPNP||Sparse||Brinker 2006||none||Extant|
|18||92565||Umbrella Lake Trail||BPNP||No info on abundance||Brinker 2006||NHIC||Extant|
|19||n/a||Zinkan Island Cove ANSI||Private||Sparse||Jalava|
|Albermarle Brook / Hope Bay near Adamsville||Probably private||Probably|
Extirpated due to road impacts or other factors
|Not found by Jalava 2008||Not found by Makkay, 2003;|
|Little Eagle Harbour||Probably private||Probably|
Extirpated; vague location data
|Not found by Jalava, 2008||Not found by Makkay 2003;|
|n/a||Birch Island||Whitefish River FN||Unknown||Macdonald 1987||Specimen in WAT; needs verification; (probably not P. hillii)||Unknown|
|Black Creek||Private||Not found||Makkay 2003||Occasional Hellquist 1983||Historical|
|S of Mindemoya|
|Private||Not found||Makkay 2003||Rare|
|N. of Providence Bay Rd (=Government Rd)||Private||Not found||Makkay 2003||Abundant|
|Shrigley Bay-Marsh Lake||Private||No info||J.K Morton 2000||Noble, 1995 (=M&V?)||Extant|
|South Baymouth||Private||1000||Makkay, 2003||Abundant|
|South Bay at the Leason Bay bridge||Private||6000||Makkay, 2003||Occasional|
|Bethel Creek (SSW of Mt Forest)||Probably Private||Not found||Makkay 2003||1978||Historical|
|Caledon Lakes Forest ANSI||Private||No info||1986||Near Orangeville||Historical|
|Green Lake and Caledon Lake||Private and Town of Caledon (gravel pit)||100 (Makkay)||Followes & Varga 2004|
|Oldham, 2003; Makkay, 2003;|
|Smoky Creek/Mallet River|
(SSW of Mt Forest)
|Probably Private||4000||Makkay 2003||1978||Extant|
|St. Thomas||Probably Private||Extirpated||1951||Not relocated despite several searches||Extirpated|
Appendix C: Detailed Characteristics of Hill’s Pondweed Habitat
The following are species associated with the habitat of Hill's Pondweed:
- Scattered trees:
- Red Maple (Acer rubrum)
- American Elm (Ulmus americana)
- Green Ash (Fraxinus pensylvanica)
- Tamarack (Larix laricina)
- Eastern White Cedar (Thuja occidentalis).
- Tall shrubs:
- Speckled Alder (Alnus incana ssp. rugosa)
- Willow species (Salix discolor,
- S. eriocephala, S. petiolaris, S. candida)
- Red-osier Dogwood (Cornus stolonifera)
- Nannyberry (Viburnum lentago).
- Occasional Low shrubs:
- Sweet Gale (Myrica gale)
- Narrow-leaved Meadow-sweet (Spiraea alba).
- Wettest areas
- Green-fruit Bur-reed
- (Sparganium emersum ssp. emersum)
- Small’s Spikerush (Eleocharis smallii)
- Cyperus-like Sedge (Carex pseudo-cyperus).
- Areas with less standing water or only intermittently flooded:
- Reed Canary Grass (Phalaris arundinacea)
- Bluejoint Reedgrass (Calamagrostis canadensis)
- Tussock Sedge (Carex stricta)
- Water Horsetail (Equisetum fluviatile).
Open water channels and small ponds often have submerged aquatic, floating-leaved aquatic, and free-floating aquatic components. Typical species in these zones include:
- Greater Bladderwort (Utricularia vulgaris)
- Common Water-milfoil (Myriophyllum sibiricum)
- Floating Pondweed (Potamogeton natans)
- Common Mare's-tail (Hippuris vulgaris)
- Lesser Duckweed (Lemna minor)
- The alga Chara vulgaris.
According to Hellquist (1984) Hill’s Pondweed is associated with Potamogeton foliosus, P. natans, P. pusillus, P. amplifolius and P. gramineus and rarely found with P. strictifolius, P. friesii, and P. pectinatus which are common in more eutrophic waters. Some examples of places where Hill's Pondweed is found (Jalava, 2009) include:
- an embayment of a creek surrounded by thicket swamp;
- open water of a beaver flood, under floating aquatics such as Duckweed (Lemna spp.);
- a drawn-down beaver-flood after a dam has been let out;
- in open water of a narrow, slow, stagnant stream surrounded by marsh with numerous snags;
- a drawn-down beaver-flood, surrounded by Common Cattail (Typha latifolia), and Sweet Gale, with peat hummocks and organic muck substrate;
- in open water of a stream flowing through a wetland dominated by Canada Blue-joint and Tussock Sedge;
- in a 10 m x 15 m pool, in water 5-15 cm deep, in a drawn-down beaver-flood, surrounded by marshy thicket swamp with peat hummocks and organic muck substrate;
- in the open water of a narrow brook, surrounded by thicket swamps and meadow marsh;
- in open water of a marshy wetland dominated by Common Cattail and Soft-stem Bulrush (Schoenoplectus tabernaemontanae) with Water Smartweed (Polygonum amphibium);
- in a small pond with abundant snags, with Northern Manna Grass (Glyceria cf. borealis) and Green-fruited Bur-reed (Sparganium cf. emersum), surrounded by scattered patches of Willow species and Common Cattail.
1 Sites are not usually considered extirpated until they have been searched on at least 2 separate occasions in different years and/or the habitat has significantly changed.
3 Priority reflects the degree to which the action contributes directly to the conservation of the species or is an essential precursor to an action that contributes to the conservation of the species.
- Date Modified: