Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards, as per the Policy on Communications and Federal Identity.
Multi-species Action Plan for Kejimkujik National Park and National Historic Site of Canada [Proposed]
Parks Canada Agency. 2016. Multi-species Action Plan for Kejimkujik National Park and National Historic Site of Canada [Proposed]. Species at Risk Act Action Plan Series. Parks Canada Agency, Ottawa. v + 28 pp.
For copies of the action plan, or for additional information on species at risk, including Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) Status Reports, residence descriptions, recovery strategies, and other related recovery documents, please visit the Species at Risk Public Registry.
Eel Weir, Kejimkujik, Eric Le Bel Parks Canada © 2013
Water Pennywort, Megan Crowley, Parks Canada © 2013
Blanding’s Turtle hatchling, Megan Crowley, Parks Canada © 2007
Piping Plover, Wesley Pitts, Friends of Keji © 2013
Également disponible en français sous le titre:
Plan d’action visant des espèces multiples dans le parc national et lieu historique du Canada Kejimkujik [proposition]
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of the Environment and Climate Change, 2016. All rights reserved.
ISBN - ISBN to come
Catalogue nº - Catalogue nº to come
Content (excluding the illustrations) may be used without permission, with appropriate credit to the source.
Table of Contents
- Approval Statement
- Executive Summary
- 1. Context
- 2. Site-based Population and Distribution Objectives
- 3. Conservation and Recovery Measures
- 4. Critical Habitat
- 4.1 Identification of Critical Habitat for Eastern Ribbonsnake (Atlantic population)
- 4.2 Identification of Critical Habitat for Vole Ears Lichen
- 4.3 Proposed Measures to Protect Critical Habitat
- 5. Evaluation of Socio-Economic Costs and of Benefits
- 6. Measuring Progress
- 7. References
- Appendix A: Species information, objectives and monitoring plans for species at risk in KNP & NHS
- Appendix B: Conservation and recovery measures that will be conducted by KNP and HS
- Appendix C: Other conservation and recovery measures that will be encouraged through partnerships or when additional resources become available
The Parks Canada Agency led the development of this federal action plan under the Species at Risk Act. The relevant Field Unit Superintendent hereby approves this document indicating that the relevant Species at Risk Act requirements related to action plan development have been fulfilled in accordance with the Act.
A/Site Superintendent, Kejimkujik National Park and National Historic Site
Parks Canada Agency
Field Unit Superintendent, Mainland Nova Scotia Field Unit
Parks Canada Agency
The federal, provincial, and territorial government signatories under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk (1996) agreed to establish complementary legislation and programs that provide for effective protection of species at risk throughout Canada. Under the Species at Risk Act (S.C. 2002, c.29) (SARA), the federal competent ministers are responsible for the preparation of action plans for species listed as Extirpated, Endangered, and Threatened for which recovery has been deemed feasible. They are also required to report on progress five years after the publication of the final document on the Species at Risk Public Registry.
Under SARA, one or more action plan(s) provides the detailed recovery planning that supports the strategic direction set out in the recovery strategies for the species. The plan outlines what needs to be done to achieve the population and distribution objectives (previously referred to as recovery goals and objectives) identified in the recovery strategies, including the measures to be taken to address the threats and monitor the recovery of the species, as well as the proposed measures to protect critical habitat that have been identified for the species. The action plan also includes an evaluation of the socio-economic costs of the action plan and the benefits to be derived from its implementation. The action plan is considered one in a series of documents that are linked and should be taken into consideration together with the COSEWIC status reports, management plans, recovery strategies, and other action plans produced for these species.
The Minister responsible for the Parks Canada Agency (the Minister of the Environment and Climate Change) is the competent minister under SARA for the species in Kejimkujik National Park and National Historic Site and has prepared this action plan to implement the recovery strategies as they apply to these sites, as per section 47 of SARA. It has been prepared in cooperation with Environment and Climate Change Canada, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, the Province of Nova Scotia, and Kwilmu'kw Maw-klusuaqn (KMK), as per section 48(1) of SARA.
Implementation of this action plan is subject to appropriations, priorities, and budgetary constraints of Parks Canada and other participating jurisdictions and organizations.
Thanks are extended to the Blanding’s Turtle, Eastern Ribbonsnake, Piping Plover and Atlantic Coastal Plain Flora Recovery Teams for their knowledge and input. The following individuals and organizations also facilitated the development of this document through their participation in the site-analysis process: Environment and Climate Change Canada (Julie McKnight), Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources (Mark Elderkin), Kwilmu'kw Maw-klusuaqn (Michael Cox), Mersey Tobeatic Research Institute (Jeffie McNeil, Brad Toms, Amanda Lavers), Friends of Keji (Norm Green), Acadia University (Tom Herman, Steve Mockford), and Bird Studies Canada (Sue Abbott). Parks Canada would also like to thank NatureServe Canada and the Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre for providing data and information used in assessing the status of species in Kejimkujik National Park and National Historic Site, and Dave Andrews at Environment and Climate Change Canada for preparing the critical habitat maps.
The Multi-species Action Plan for Kejimkujik National Park and National Historic Site of Canada applies to lands and waters occurring within the boundaries of Kejimkujik National Park and National Historic Site (KNP and NHS), including Kejimkujik National Park Seaside. The plan meets the requirements for action plans set out in the Species at Risk Act (SARA (s.47)) for species requiring an action plan and that regularly occur within these sites. Measures described in this plan will also provide benefits for other species of conservation concern that regularly occur at KNP and NHS.
Where it has been determined that the park can conduct management activities to help recover and/or manage a species, park-specific objectives are identified in this plan and represent the site’s contribution to those presented in federal recovery strategies and management plans. Species at risk, their residences, and their habitat are protected by existing regulations and management regimes in national parks and national historic sites, as well as by SARA. Additional measures that will contribute to the survival, recovery and understanding of the species in Kejimkujik are described in this plan. These measures were identified based on threats and measures outlined in federal and provincial status assessments and recovery documents, as well as knowledge of the status and needs of each species in Kejimkujik NP and NHS. Population monitoring measures are also identified for the species for which management activities at these sites can contribute to recovery.
Critical habitat is identified in this action plan for Vole Ears Lichen, and for two additional sites for Eastern Ribbonsnake (Atlantic population). Measures used for protection of critical habitat in Kejimkujik are described.
Measures proposed in this action plan will have limited socio-economic impact and place no restrictions on land use outside of KNP or NHS. Direct costs of implementing this action plan will be borne by Parks Canada. Indirect costs are expected to be minimal, while benefits will include positive impacts on ecological integrity, greater awareness and appreciation of the value of biodiversity to Canadians, and opportunities for engagement of local communities and Indigenous groups.
The inland portion of Kejimkujik National Park and National Historic Site of Canada (hereafter Kejimkujik Inland) was acquired from the province of Nova Scotia in 1967 and formally established as a national park in 1974. The coastal portion of the park, Kejimkujik National Park of Canada Seaside (hereafter Kejimkujik Seaside), was acquired from the province in 1985 and was designated as part of the park in 1988. These two areas protect 403 km² of lands and waters in southwestern Nova Scotia (Figure 1), and hereafter are collectively referred to as Kejimkujik, or KNP and NHS. Kejimkujik Inland was established to protect representative examples of the Atlantic Coastal Uplands Region. Its forests include mixed coniferous and deciduous vegetation comprised of tree species including maple, hemlock, birch, beech, red oak, spruce and pine. This is often described as the Acadian forest type, with a high level of understory plant and animal diversity. Park aquatic ecosystems reflect the influence of shallow, acidic, warm water lakes, still waters and meandering streams featuring significant seasonal water level changes. Kejimkujik Seaside was established to provide protection for the unique coastal attributes of this region.
In 1995, Kejimkujik Inland was designated as a national historic site. This makes it unique – it is the only Canadian national park where a majority of the landscape has also been designated as a national historic site. Mi’kmaq have lived and traveled in the Kejimkujik area for at least 4,500 years and KNP and NHS contains petroglyphs, habitation sites, fishing areas, hunting territories, travel routes and burial sites. The wilderness character of Kejimkujik is an integral part of this cultural landscape. At Kejimkujik Seaside, Mi’kmaq used the coast for hunting and gathering while camping in the surrounding harbours. At the time of European expansion into North America, the Mi’kmaq occupied a vast territory in what is now Atlantic Canada. According to oral traditions, their overall territory was divided into seven districts. The district of Kespukwitk (
lands end) covers southwestern Nova Scotia and includes Kejimkujik.
In 2001, the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) designated the five counties of southwest Nova Scotia (Annapolis, Digby, Yarmouth, Shelburne, and Queens) as a biosphere reserve in recognition of the area’s rich biodiversity and cultural history. Kejimkujik Inland, the Tobeatic Wilderness Area, and a portion of the Shelburne River (a Canadian Heritage River) function as the core protected area for the Southwest Nova Biosphere Reserve. This reserve is the second largest in Canada and first to be designated in Atlantic Canada. It focuses on regional cooperation and sustainable development.
Maintenance and restoration of ecological integrity is the first priority of national parks (Canada National Parks Act s.8(2)). Species at risk, their residences, and their habitat are therefore protected in Canada’s national parks by existing national park regulations and management regimes as well as by SARA. In addition, the Species at Risk Act (SARA) prohibitions protecting individuals and residences apply automatically when a species is listed, and all critical habitat in national parks and national historic sites must be legally protected within 180 days of being identified.
Recovery measures for species at risk will be integrated within the framework of Parks Canada’s ongoing ecological integrity programs. National parks maintain comprehensive, scientifically rigorous ecological integrity monitoring and restoration programs that are organized according to the major ecosystems present in the park. The recovery measures described in this action plan are therefore organized in the same manner. Parks Canada’s ecological integrity programs make contributions to the recovery of species at risk by providing inventory and monitoring data, and through the implementation of habitat restoration projects and other conservation action on the ground. The species-directed measures outlined in this plan will in turn contribute to maintaining and improving the ecological integrity of Kejimkujik by improving the conservation status of native species and their habitat, and maintaining biodiversity. Species at risk information will also be integrated into comprehensive visitor experience, education and outreach programs, helping to improve awareness, appreciation, and support for recovery efforts in Kejimkujik and beyond.
A number of federal and provincial recovery strategies and plans, management plans, and action plans have been prepared for species considered in this action plan. Along with status assessments, those documents provide guidance for the recovery of individual species, including strategic directions, recovery objectives, critical habitat, and threats. This action plan was developed and will be implemented in a manner that is consistent with those recovery documents, and should be viewed as part of this body of linked strategies and plans.
1.1 Scope of the Action Plan
The geographic scope of this action plan includes all lands and waters within the boundaries of Kejimkujik, including both Kejimkujik Inland and Kejimkujik Seaside (Figure 1), as described in Schedule 1 of the Canada National Parks Act. This multi-species action plan has been written specifically for Kejimkujik NP and NHS because the Parks Canada Agency (PCA) is legally responsible for species at risk on PCA lands and waters, has the ability to take direct conservation action, and deals with different threats, legislation, and management priorities than areas outside of these sites.
Long description of Figure 1
This map shows Kejimkujik National Park and National Historic Site of Canada in Southwestern Nova Scotia. The entrance is in Maitland Bridge, NS. The location of the major roads and trails are shown on the map. There are numerous lakes and rivers in the landscape. An inset map of the Kejimkujik National Park of Canada Seaside is also included. This portion of the site is situated near Port Joli and St. Catherine’s River, NS on the Atlantic coast.
This action plan addresses SARA-listed species that regularly occur in KNP and NHS and which require an action plan under SARA (s.47), as well as other species of conservation concern (Table 1). This approach both responds to the legislated requirements of the SARA and provides the Parks Canada Agency with a comprehensive plan for species conservation and recovery at these sites. The plan will be amended as required to meet SARA requirements for action planning.
|Species||COSEWIC assessment||SARA Schedule 1 status|
|Blanding’s Turtle (Nova Scotia population [pop.]) Emydoidea blandingii||Endangered||Endangered|
|Little Brown Myotis Myotis lucifugus||Endangered||Endangered|
|Northern Myotis Myotis septentrionalis||Endangered||Endangered|
|Piping Plover Charadrius melodus melodus||Endangered||Endangered|
|Tri-colored Bat Perimyotis subflavus||Endangered||Endangered|
|Vole Ears Lichen Erioderma mollissimum||Endangered||Endangered|
|American Eel Anguilla rostrata||Threatened||Under listing consideration|
|Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica||Threatened||Under listing consideration|
|Canada Warbler Wilsonia canadensis||Threatened||Threatened|
|Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica||Threatened||Threatened|
|Common Nighthawk Chordeiles minor||Threatened||Threatened|
|Eastern Ribbonsnake Thamnophis sauritus||Threatened||Threatened|
|Olive-sided Flycatcher Contopus cooperi||Threatened||Threatened|
|Blue Felt Lichen Degelia plumbea||Special Concern||Under listing consideration|
|Eastern Wood-Pewee Contopus virens||Special Concern||Under listing consideration|
|Long’s Bulrush Scirpus longii||Special Concern||Special Concern|
|Monarch Danaus plexippus||Special Concern||Special Concern|
|Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus||Special Concern||Special Concern|
|Snapping Turtle Chelydra serpentina||Special Concern||Special Concern|
|Water Pennywort Hydrocotyle umbellata||Special Concern||Threatened|
|Black AshTable 1 note1 Fraxinus nigra||Not listed||Not listed|
|Eastern MooseTable 1 note2 (Mainland Population) Alces alces americana||Not listed||Not listed|
2. Site-based Population and Distribution Objectives
The potential for PCA to undertake management actions at these sites that will contribute to the recovery of each species was assessed. Site-specific population and distribution objectives were developed to identify the contribution that Kejimkujik can make towards achieving the national objectives presented in recovery strategies and management plans (Appendix A). Monitoring activities are also reported in Appendix A because they are directly linked to population and distribution objectives.
If there is little opportunity for the Kejimkujik NP and NHS to contribute to the recovery of a species, site-specific objectives and conservation actions may be limited to protection measures in place under the Canada National Parks Act and SARA, population monitoring, habitat maintenance and restoration through the existing management regime at these sites. For many species, population and distribution objectives for park lands are not meaningful at the scale of this action plan for various reasons, including: 1) threats cannot be controlled in the park or do not exist in the park (e.g., widespread disease, loss of overwintering habitat elsewhere); 2) the species is only transient in the park; or 3) population within the site is a very small part of the Canadian distribution or is unknown or unconfirmed.
3. Conservation and Recovery Measures
The forests, wetlands, freshwater, and coastal habitats of Kejimkujik are biologically diverse and provide important ecosystem functions for species at risk. This action plan includes assessment of the knowledge, threats, and status of populations of each species at risk in Kejimkujik.
This action planning process identified measures to achieve the site-based population and distribution objectives, along with measures required to protect the species and learn more about them. The process of determining which measures will be conducted by the Park (Appendix B) and which measures will be encouraged through partnerships or when additional resources come available (Appendix C) involved a prioritization process. Additional measures have been developed for Kejimkujik that focus on outreach, education, and visitor experience related to species at risk (Appendix D). The prioritization process primarily considered ecological effectiveness of measures, and also included consideration of opportunities to increase the value of visitor experience to the park, opportunities to increase awareness through external relations, and budgetary opportunities and constraints. Wherever possible, Kejimkujik is taking an ecosystem approach, prioritizing actions that benefit numerous species at once to effectively and efficiently protect and recover species at risk.
Five themes have emerged from the identification of measures: Restoration and Protection; Threat Mitigation; First Nation Involvement; Volunteer Stewardship and Visitor Engagement; and Filling Knowledge Gaps.
Restoration and Protection
Restoration and protection of habitats and populations are key activities for the conservation and recovery of species at risk. Work will continue on projects such as
Piping Plover habitat enhancement efforts at Kejimkujik Seaside, the placement of Barn Swallow nesting boxes in current and historical locations, and the protection and maintenance of habitats for species at risk that occur in Kejimkujik.
Kejimkujik will continue to assess and mitigate threats to species at risk. This will involve continuing the nest protection program for Blanding’s Turtles and Snapping Turtles to prevent destruction of nests by predators or flooding. The campground food and garbage awareness program will work to reduce the number of hyperabundant predators with artificially elevated populations that prey on turtle/bird eggs and hatchlings. Road mortality mitigation measures include speed reduction and signage along roadside nesting areas for the Blanding’s Turtle. Road barriers will be placed at Grafton Lake to mitigate road mortality for the Eastern Ribbonsnake. The Freshwater Recovery project in Kejimkujik aims to prevent the introduction and/or establishment of exotic predatory fish which could threaten the Blanding’s Turtles and Eastern Ribbonsnakes. In addition, beach closures and barriers will be used to mitigate human disturbance on Piping Plover nesting beaches and high-use visitor areas with Water Pennywort.
First Nation Involvement
Kejimkujik is part of a cultural landscape where Mi’kmaw people have lived in and traveled through for at least 4,500 years. There are a number of culturally significant species at risk in Kejimkujik including but not limited to the American Eel, Mainland Moose, and Black Ash. Kejimkujik will work with Mi'kmaw partners in species at risk recovery efforts, to connect and share knowledge in non-conventional ways, and to highlight the culturally significant species at risk that occur within KNP and NHS.
Volunteer Stewardship and Visitor Engagement
Kejimkujik is part of a large volunteer program that encompasses the greater Kejimkujik ecosystem. Each year, over 300 volunteers contribute more than 10,000 hours of their time to species at risk recovery and environmental conservation. This represents over 155,000 hours since 2000. One example is the large role that volunteers play in Blanding’s Turtle nest protection and hatchling emergence. Kejimkujik will continue to involve the public in meaningful recovery actions for species at risk through the volunteer program. In addition, over 70% of visitors to Kejimkujik are repeat visitors. Many of these individuals visit annually and understand how their actions can positively influence species recovery (i.e., watching for wildlife while driving, proper campground garbage and food storage, or by volunteering).
Filling Knowledge Gaps
Research and monitoring are required to fill gaps in the knowledge base for some species at risk that are cryptic, long-lived, or recently listed. Many of these actions will require partnerships and/or additional funding, and will benefit from the opportunity to collaborate with the academic community and the volunteer program. This includes an assessment of the long-term effectiveness and recovery gains from the turtle headstarting program, determination of distribution and abundance for some of the species at risk in Kejimkujik, and research to develop methods to overcome the challenges involved in Eastern Ribbonsnake recovery. Refer to the schedule of studies in relevant recovery strategies for further details.
4. Critical Habitat
Critical habitat is
the habitat that is necessary for the survival or recovery of a listed wildlife species and that is identified as the species’ critical habitat in the recovery strategy or in an action plan for the species (SARA s. 2(1)). At the time of writing of this document, it was possible to identify additional critical habitat in KNP and NHS for the Eastern Ribbonsnake and the Vole Ears Lichen. Critical habitat has already been identified in Kejimkujik in recovery strategies for the Piping Plover, Blanding’s Turtle, Eastern Ribbonsnake, and Water Pennywort. Where critical habitat identification is not complete, it will be identified in an upcoming or revised action plan or revised recovery strategy.
4.1 Identification of Critical Habitat for Eastern Ribbonsnake (Atlantic population)
4.1.1. Geographic Location
Two additional areas of critical habitat are newly identified for the Eastern Ribbonsnake near Grafton Lake (Figure 2). These areas are overwintering sites identified. Overwintering habitat is critical for ribbonsnake survival (Parks Canada Agency, 2012b). The two forested overwintering sites at Grafton Lake in Kejimkujik, are the first confirmed in Nova Scotia, and were discovered by observing snakes in early spring and late fall. Both sites are located in mixedwood forests, approximately 150 m from the nearest wetland, in sloped and well-drained areas with numerous small underground holes. It has been observed that while snakes return to the same general site each year, the concentration spots vary, suggesting that the snakes may be using different underground holes each winter.
Critical habitat at the terrestrial overwintering site for the Eastern Ribbonsnake was identified using a similar process to the identification of wetland-based critical habitat in the species recovery strategy (Section 6.2). The following process was applied to identify the extent of the critical habitat:
- Sites were included that were confirmed as an overwintering area for two or more winters based on late fall and early spring sightings. A minimum convex polygon (MCP) was drawn around all observation points at the site.
- Critical habitat includes the area within the MCP, as well as a 100 metre zone around the boundaries of the MCP to capture travel to and from the overwintering site.
This process was specific to the two overwintering sites at Grafton Lake. As more overwintering sites are identified, the process will be reviewed to determine if a standard protocol can be developed that applies to all overwintering critical habitat.
Long description of Figure 2
This map shows two new locations of critical habitat for Eastern Ribbonsnake, situated near Grafton Brook, between Grafton Lake and Kejimkujik Lake. Critical habitat identified in Kejimkujik in the Recovery Strategy for Eastern Ribbonsnake (2012) is also shown, primarily in wetland and lakeshore areas surrounding the lakes in the southeast portion of Kejimkujik.
4.1.2. Biophysical Attributes
The biophysical attributes of suitable Eastern Ribbonsnake habitat, including basking, cover, feeding/shedding, gestation, birthing and mating habitat, are detailed in section 1.81 of the recovery strategy (Parks Canada Agency, 2012b). Critical habitat for the Eastern Ribbonsnake occurs where the critical habitat criteria and methodology described in section 6.2 of the recovery strategy are met (Parks Canada Agency, 2012b). Additional criteria for the identification of overwintering site critical habitat is detailed above, as it relates to known concentration areas, and allowing for travel to and from the overwintering site.
4.1.3 Examples of Activities Likely to Result in Destruction of Critical Habitat
Examples of activities likely to result in the destruction of critical habitat are described in section 6.4 of the recovery strategy (Parks Canada Agency, 2012b).
4.2 Identification of Critical Habitat for Vole Ears Lichen
4.2.1 Geographic Location
Additional critical habitat for Vole Ears Lichen is identified in Figure 3. This plan identifies one new site in addition to the sites identified in Table 5 of the Vole Ears Lichen recovery strategy (Environment Canada, 2014b).
Long description of Figure 3
This map shows Kejimkujik National Park Seaside and a single point location indicating critical habitat for Vole Ears Lichen in the park. The point is situated roughly in the centre of the park area, inland between Little Port Joli and St. Catherine’s Beach lagoons.
4.2.2 Biophysical Attributes
The biophysical attributes of critical habitat for Vole Ears Lichen in Nova Scotia are described in section 7.1 of the recovery strategy (Environment Canada, 2014b). Critical habitat for Vole Ears Lichen occurs where the critical habitat criteria and methodology described in section 7.1 of the recovery strategy are met (Environment Canada, 2014b).
4.2.3 Examples of Activities Likely to Result in Destruction of Critical Habitat
Examples of activities likely to result in the destruction of critical habitat are described in section 7.3 of the recovery strategy (Environment Canada, 2014b).
4.3 Proposed Measures to Protect Critical Habitat
Critical habitat identified in this action plan and in other recovery documents within KNP and NHS will be legally protected from destruction as per section 58 of the Species at Risk Act.
5. Evaluation of Socio-Economic Costs and of Benefits
The Species at Risk Act requires the responsible federal minister to undertake
an evaluation of the socio-economic costs of the action plan and the benefits to be derived from its implementation.
The total cost to implement the action plan will be borne by Parks Canada out of existing budgets. Many of the proposed measures will be integrated into the operational management of Kejimkujik. This includes incremental salary costs, materials, equipment, and contracting of professional services for measures outlined in Appendix B. No major socio-economic costs to park visitors, partners, stakeholders or Indigenous groups are expected as a result of this action plan. Additional resources or partnerships will be sought to support the measures outlined in Appendix C.
The action plan applies to lands and waters in Kejimkujik, and does not bring any restrictions to land use outside the park and site. As such, this action plan will place no socio-economic costs on the public. However, minor restrictions may be placed on visitor activities on park lands and waters to protect and recover species at risk.
Measures presented in this action plan for Kejimkujik will contribute to meeting recovery strategy objectives for threatened and endangered species, and will also contribute to meeting management objectives for species of special concern. These measures are expected to have an overall positive impact on ecological integrity and enhance opportunities for appreciation of the sites and the species by visitors and the general public. This action plan includes measures that could result in benefits to Canadians, such as positive impacts on biodiversity and the value individuals place on preserving biodiversity (Federal, Provincial, Territorial Governments of Canada, 2014).
The proposed measures seek a balanced approach to reducing or eliminating threats to species-at-risk populations and habitats, and include protection of individuals and their habitat (e.g., restrictions to human activities within areas occupied by the species, combined with ongoing research and monitoring), potential species re-establishment, and increasing public awareness and stewardship (e.g., signage, visitor programs, and highlights in communication media).
Potential economic benefits of the recovery of the species at risk found in Kejimkujik cannot be easily quantified, as many of the values derived from wildlife are non-market commodities that are difficult to appraise in financial terms. Wildlife, in all its forms, has value in and of itself, and is valued by Canadians for aesthetic, cultural, spiritual, recreational, educational, historical, economic, medical, ecological, and scientific reasons. The conservation of wildlife at risk is an important component of the Government of Canada’s commitment to conserving biological diversity, and is important to Canada’s current and future economic and natural wealth.
Implementing this action plan is expected to have benefits for park visitors, local residents, and Indigenous groups. These include opportunities to learn about and take part in the recovery of culturally important species at risk, opportunities for visitors and local communities to be involved in conservation issues, opportunities for integration of Indigenous Traditional Knowledge into conservation issues in KNP and NHS, and greater awareness of Indigenous values and culture among local residents and visitors to the parks. In doing so the plan supports the goals under the Species at Risk Act
the traditional knowledge of the aboriginal peoples of Canada should be considered in the assessment of which species may be at risk and in developing and implementing recovery measures.
6. Measuring Progress
Reporting on implementation of this action plan (under s. 55 of SARA) will be done by assessing progress towards implementing the measures presented in Appendices B, appendixC, and appendixD. Reporting on the ecological impacts of the action plan will be done by assessing progress towards meeting the site-based population and distribution objectives presented in Appendix A.
Broders, H.G., G. M. Quinn and G.J. Forbes. 2003. Species status, and the spatial and temporal patterns of activity of bats in southwest Nova Scotia, Canada. Northeastern Naturalist 10:383-398.
COSEWIC. 2009. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Vole Ears Erioderma mollissimum in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. ix + 51 pp.
COSEWIC. 2011. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. ix + 37 pp.
Davis, D.S. and S. Browne. 1996. Natural History of Nova Scotia. Nimbus Publishing and Nova Scotia Museum, Halifax.
Environment Canada and Parks Canada Agency. 2010. Recovery Strategy and Management Plan for Multiple Species of Atlantic Coastal Plain Flora in Canada. Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series. Environment Canada and Parks Canada Agency. Ottawa. 96 pp. + appendices
Environment Canada. 2012. Recovery Strategy for the Piping Plover (Charadrius melodus melodus) in Canada. Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series. Environment Canada, Ottawa, v + 29 pp.
Environment Canada. 2013. Scientific review of the recovery program for the Piping Plover (melodus subspecies) in Eastern Canada. Prepared by Sheri Gratto-Trevor, Gregory J. Robinson, and Christine A. Bishop. Wildlife Research Division, Science and Technology Branch, Environment Canada. 97 pp.
Environment Canada. 2014b. Recovery Strategy for the Vole Ears Lichen (Erioderma mollissimum) in Canada. Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series. Environment Canada, Ottawa, v + 31 pp.
Environment Canada. 2015. Management Plan for the Rusty Blackbird (Euphagus carolinus) in Canada. Species at Risk Act Management Plan Series. Environment Canada, Ottawa. iv + 22 pp.
Environment Canada. 2016a. Recovery Strategy for Canada Warbler (Cardellina canadensis) in Canada. Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series. Environment Canada, Ottawa. vi + 56 pp.
Environment Canada. 2016b. Recovery Strategy for the Common Nighthawk (Chordeiles minor) in Canada. Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series. Environment Canada, Ottawa. vi + 49 pp.
Environment Canada. 2016c. Recovery Strategy for Olive-sided Flycatcher (Contopus cooperi) in Canada. Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series. Environment Canada, Ottawa. vi + 52 pp.
Environment and Climate Change Canada. 2016d. Management Plan for the Snapping Turtle (Chelydra serpentina) in Canada [Proposed]. Species at Risk Act Management Plan Series. Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa. iv + 39 p.
Environment and Climate Change Canada. 2016e. Management Plan for the Monarch (Danaus plexippus) in Canada. Species at Risk Act Management Plan Series. Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa. iv + 45 pp.
Green N. and J. McNeil. 2014. Updating the Population Viability Analysis model for the Kejimkujik population of Blanding’s turtles in Nova Scotia. Mersey Tobeatic Research Institute, Kempt, NS.
Lunn, S. 1972. Avifaunal survey of Kejimkujik National Park 1971-72. Acadia University, Wolfville. Vii + 201 pp.
Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources (DNR). 2007. Recovery Plan for Moose (Alces alces americana) in Mainland Nova Scotia. Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources. 38 pp.
NS DNR. 2010. Provincial (Nova Scotia) Status Report on Black Ash, Fraxinus nigra. Prepared for Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources by Donna D. Hurlburt. Annapolis Royal, NS. v + 21 pp.
Parks Canada Agency. 2010. Kejimkujik National Park and National Historic of Canada Management Plan. Parks Canada, Maitland Bridge, NS. xii + 87 pages.
Parks Canada Agency. 2008. Detailed Assessment for the Mainland Moose (Alces americanus) in Kejimkujik National Park and National Historic Site of Canada. Species at Risk Detailed Assessments. Parks Canada Agency. Ottawa. 3 pp.
Parks Canada Agency. 2011a. Detailed Assessment for the Snapping Turtle (Chelydra serpentina) in Kejimkujik National Park and National Historic Site of Canada. Species at Risk Detailed Assessments. Parks Canada Agency. Ottawa. 6 pp.
Parks Canada Agency. 2011b. Detailed Assessment for the Water Pennywort (Hydrocotyle umbellata) in Kejimkujik National Park and National Historic Site of Canada. Species at Risk Detailed Assessments. Parks Canada Agency. Ottawa. 6 pp.
Parks Canada Agency. 2012a. Recovery Strategy for the Blanding’s turtle (Emydoidea blandingii), Nova Scotia population, in Canada. Species at Risk Recovery Strategy Series. Parks Canada, Ottawa. vii +43 pages.
Parks Canada Agency. 2012b. Recovery Strategy for the Eastern Ribbonsnake (Thamnophis sauritus), Atlantic population, in Canada. Species at Risk Recovery Strategy Series. Parks Canada, Ottawa. viii +34 pages
Parks Canada Agency. 2013a. Detailed Assessment for the Barn Swallow (Hirundo rustica) in Kejimkujik National Park and National Historic Site of Canada. Species at Risk Detailed Assessments. Parks Canada Agency. Ottawa. 6 pp.
Parks Canada Agency. 2013b. Detailed Assessment for the Blue Felt Lichen (Degelia plumbea) in Kejimkujik National Park and National Historic Site of Canada. Species at Risk Detailed Assessments. Parks Canada Agency. Ottawa. 6 pp.
Parks Canada Agency. 2013c. Detailed Assessment for Long’s Bulrush (Scirpus longii) in Kejimkujik National Park and National Historic Site of Canada. Species at Risk Detailed Assessments. Parks Canada Agency. Ottawa. 4 pp.
Parks Canada Agency. 2014a. Detailed Assessment for the American Eel (Anguilla rostrata) in Kejimkujik National Park and National Historic Site of Canada. Species at Risk Detailed Assessments. Parks Canada Agency. Ottawa. 6 pp.
Parks Canada Agency. 2014b. Detailed Assessment for the Eastern Wood Pewee (Contopus virens) in Kejimkujik National Park and National Historic Site of Canada. Species at Risk Detailed Assessments. Parks Canada Agency. Ottawa. 5 pp.
Parks Canada Agency. 2014c. Detailed Assessment for Little Brown Myotis (Myotis lucifugus) in Kejimkujik National Park and National Historic Site of Canada. Species at Risk Detailed Assessments. Parks Canada Agency. Ottawa. 6 pp.
Parks Canada Agency. 2014d. Detailed Assessment for Northern Myotis (Myotis septentrionalis) in Kejimkujik National Park and National Historic Site of Canada. Species at Risk Detailed Assessments. Parks Canada Agency. Ottawa. 6 pp.
Parks Canada Agency. 2014e. Detailed Assessment for Tri-coloured Bat (Perimyotis subflavus) in Kejimkujik National Park and National Historic Site of Canada. Species at Risk Detailed Assessments. Parks Canada Agency. Ottawa. 7 pp.
Richardson, D.H.S. and R.P. Cameron. 2004. Cyanolichens: Their response to pollution and possible management strategies for their conservation in Northeastern North America. Northeastern Naturalist 11: 1-22.
Westwood, A., P. Solymos, T. Fontaine, and E. Bayne. 2015. Estimating population density of the Rusty Blackbird (Euphagus carolinus), Olive-sided Flycatcher (Contopus cooperi) and Canada Warbler (Cardellina canadensis) in national parks in New Brunswick Nova Scotia. Boreal avian modelling project, Dalhousie University and University of Alberta. vii + 55 pp.
Appendix A: Species information, objectives and monitoring plans for species at risk in KNP & NHS
|Species||National objectivesTable note3||Site-based population & distribution objectives||Population trend in KejimkujikTable note4||Population monitoringTable note5||General information and broad park approach|
|Blanding’s Turtle (Nova Scotia pop.)||Achieve a self-sustaining population by maintaining and/or increasing the existing populations over the current range, with a less than 5% risk of extinction when projected over 10 generations (400 years), and maintain sufficient gene flow to prevent genetic isolation.||1) Maintain or increase adult survivorship at or above 98% 2) Maintain recruitment at or above two new nesting females every five years, on average.||Inferred and projected decline; updated population viability analysis suggests population is at risk of decline and extinction.||Blanding’s Turtle are assessed as part of the ecological integrity monitoring program at Kejimkujik. Monitoring data are derived from nest protection, trapping, tracking, visual surveys, and hatchling emergence.||Through the headstarting project, over 250 turtles have been reared and released back into Kejimkujik. Nest protection efforts are maintained through a large volunteer program with the goal to protect a minimum of 19 nests each year using nest cages to prevent predation of eggs. Roadside mortality of nesting females is mitigated through the use of seasonal speed reductions, speed bumps, and signage. Habitat changes on nesting beaches is recorded through photo documentation each fall.|
|Little Brown Myotis, Northern Myotis, Tri-colored Bat||1. Short-term: Maintain and increase (where feasible) the current level of the population; Long-term: Self-sustaining, resilient, redundant and representative population;|
2. Maintain or restore the pre-white-nose syndrome (WNS) extent of occurrence.
|No objective established; status in Kejimkujik poorly understood.||Severely declining short-term trend (>70%) due to white nose syndrome.||Initiate inventory work to compare with baseline data; develop protocol to monitor trends in occurrence and activity levels.||Investigate how white nose syndrome has affected bats in Kejimkujik. Protect roosts and individuals in park buildings and infrastructure.|
|Piping Plover – melodus||1) Maintain at least 255 pairs in Atlantic Canada, increasing to 310 pairs over time 2) Fledge at least 1.65 chicks per pair.||1) Maintain productivity of at least 1.65 chicks per pair per year 2) Maintain at least 4 pairs at the Kejimkujik Seaside on St. Catherine’s and Little Port Joli Beaches (both calculated as a 5 year running average).||Population 1988-2008: average of 5.9 pairs, with 1.60 chicks fledged per pair. 2010-2014: average of 3.8 pairs, and 2.1 chicks fledged per pair.||As part of the ecological integrity monitoring program at Kejimkujik, Piping Plover nesting habitat is surveyed from May-August and pairs are monitored following a standardized plover monitoring protocol. Kejimkujik participates in the International Piping Plover Census, held every 5 years.||Disturbance of breeding pairs (identified as a high-level threat) is mitigated through area closures, signage, compliance, enforcement, and education. Nesting habitat is enhanced through habitat restoration efforts.|
|Vole Ears Lichen||Ensure that the species’ known range and the health and stability of the three known populations are not impacted by biological resource use (of the species’ host tree), transportation and service corridors, residential and commercial development, or invasive non-native species.||No objective established; status in Kejimkujik uncertain.||Unknown; first detected in 2011.||Lichen inventory work is required at Kejimkujik Seaside to determine abundance and distribution of this species.||One thallus on one tree detected in 2011; further inventory work required. Will continue to protect and maintain habitat.|
|Canada Warbler, Olive-sided Flycatcher, and Common Nighthawk||Short term: Halt the national decline by 2025, while ensuring the population does not decrease more than 10% over this time. Distribution objective: maintain the current extent of occurrence in Canada.||No objective established; status in Kejimkujik uncertain though park is likely of limited importance to the species' national recovery.||Unknown; breeds in park but population status unknown.||Uncommonly detected during forest bird monitoring in Kejimkujik. Supplementary reporting of observations by staff, visitors, and volunteers encouraged through education and a reporting system.||All three species breed in forests in Kejimkujik. Recent modelling predicts the occurrence of 242 territorial male Canada Warblers and 67 territorial male Olive-sided Flycatchers in Kejimkujik. This correlates with less than 1% of the estimated population of these species in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. The abundance of Common Nighthawk has not been modelled. The park will continue to protect and maintain habitat.|
|Chimney Swift||Not applicable.||No objective established; status in Kejimkujik uncertain though park is likely of limited importance to the species' national recovery.||Unknown; not enough information to inform trend in Kejimkujik.||Uncommonly detected during forest bird monitoring in Kejimkujik. Supplementary reporting of observations by staff, visitors and volunteers encouraged through education and a reporting system.||Detected in forests in Kejimkujik with likely but unconfirmed breeding activity; will continue to protect and maintain habitat.|
|Eastern Ribbonsnake||Ensure a self-sustaining population with a 95% probability of persistence across its range.||Maintain occupancy at known ribbonsnake locations in Kejimkujik.||Unknown; a reliable method to assess long-term population trends has not yet been identified.||Eastern Ribbonsnakes are surveyed at key locations in Kejimkujik through visual and conservation canine surveys.|
Known locations in the park were grouped into four areas in the recovery strategy: Kejimkujik/George/Snake Lakes, Cobreille/Peskowesk Lakes, Grafton Lake complex, and North Cranberry Lake.
|Through surveys in the fall and spring, two overwintering sites were identified in the woods near Grafton Lake. Further research is required to understand population dynamics, movements and habitat use. Vehicular mortality is mitigated through traffic barriers at the former Grafton Lake Hatchery facility area.|
|Water Pennywort||1) Maintain extant populations at present levels of abundance or greater at current locations; 2) Maintain extent and quality of habitat.||Maintain extent of Water Pennywort at the known locations in Kejimkujik.||Stable; while density is impacted by annual water levels, the population is stable at the level of the stand.||Water Pennywort is annually monitored at known locations on Kejimkujik Lake.||Occurs at seven locations on Kejimkujik Lake; will continue to protect and maintain habitat. Over 60% of Kejimkujik Lake has been recently surveyed for rare Atlantic Coastal Plain Flora species including Water Pennywort; completion of this survey work is required.|
|Long’s Bulrush||1) Maintain extant populations at present levels of abundance or greater at current locations; 2) Maintain extent and quality of habitat.||No objective established; no threats known in park and Kejimkujik is likely of limited importance to the species' conservation at a national scale.||Unknown; first documented in 2011.||Documented through the Atlantic Coastal Plain Flora atlas surveys targeted for all high priority lakeshores identified in the recovery strategy.||Seven occurrences have been documented on Kejimkujik and Loon Lakes from 2011-2013. Over 60% of Kejimkujik Lake has been recently surveyed for rare Atlantic Coastal Plain Flora species including Long’s Bulrush; completion of this survey work is required. Will continue to protect and maintain habitat.|
|Monarch||Ensure there is sufficient habitat in Canada to maintain the current population and support the management of overwintering sites by international partners.||No objective established: no threats known in park and Kejimkujik is likely of limited importance to the species' conservation at a national scale.||Unknown; not enough information to inform trend in Kejimkujik.||Monarch butterfly gardens planted in Kejimkuijk are checked during the breeding season for eggs and caterpillars; any Monarchs are reared and tagged through partnerships with Monarch Watch.||Known to occur and breed in Kejimkujik; will continue to protect and maintain habitat. Swamp milkweed grows naturally in Kejimkujik and two butterfly gardens have been planted. Over 1000 |
“Butterfly Club”kits have been sold to encourage the creation of butterfly habitat.
|Rusty Blackbird||1) Stop the decline and maintain the population at its 2014 level; 2) Increase the population, resulting in a 10-year sustained increase in the population of Rusty Blackbird in Canada.||No objective established; this species population and distribution in Kejimkujik are poorly understood.||Unknown; breeds in park but population status unknown.||Uncommonly detected during forest bird monitoring in Kejimkujik. Supplementary reporting of observations by staff, visitors and volunteers encouraged through education and a reporting system.||Likely breeds in very low numbers in forests in Kejimkujik; will continue to protect and maintain habitat.|
|Snapping Turtle||Maintain and, if possible, increase the index of area of occupancy of the Snapping Turtle in Canada and maintain and, if possible, increase Snapping Turtle abundance in Canada, by reducing the main threats to the species, particularly those affecting adult Snapping Turtles.||No objective established: currently, this species population and distribution in Kejimkujik are poorly understood.||Unknown; not enough information to measure trend in Kejimkujik.||Targeted surveys have been completed on Grafton and Kejimkujik Lake. Snapping Turtles are also monitored incidentally through the Blanding’s Turtle monitoring program (nest protection and trapping).||Extent of occurrence throughout the western side of Kejimkujik is unclear. Targeted studies at Graton Lake estimate the population size to be 147 individuals. Nests are opportunistically covered along roadsides and beaches if observed.|
|American Eel||Not applicable||No objective established: Kejimkujik is likely of limited importance to the species' conservation at a national scale.||Unknown. Eel monitoring in 17 lakes in 1975 and 2011/12 suggest declines, although sampling methods differed.||Monitored sporadically since 1975.||Continue to protect and maintain habitat. Will continue to opportunistically survey, and record observations of this species.|
|Barn Swallow||Not applicable||No objective established: no threats known in park and Kejimkujik is likely of limited importance to the species' conservation at a national scale.||Declining; numbers have dropped sharply since 2004.||63 breeding pairs documented in the park in the early 1970s. This species is uncommonly detected during forest bird monitoring and nesting has been incidentally recorded at various locations in Kejimkujik.||Barn Swallows have built nests in nesting boxes placed at Jakes Landing in Kejimkujik.|
|Black Ash||Not applicable (provincial recovery document not posted at time of writing).||No objective established: no threats known in park and Kejimkujik is likely of limited importance to the species' conservation at a national scale.||Unknown; further inventory work required.||Locations of Black Ash have been documented and mapped in Kejimkujik, however further inventory work is required.||Black Ash work in Kejimkujik will be undertaken with cultural resources staff and in collaboration with interested Mi’kmaw organizations.|
|Blue Felt Lichen||Not applicable||No objective established: status in Kejimkujik poorly understood.||Unknown; first detected in 2011.||Lichen inventory work is required at Kejimkujik Seaside to determine abundance and distribution of rare species.||Six individuals detected in 2011; further inventory work required. Will continue to protect and maintain habitat and assess threats.|
|Eastern Wood-pewee||Not applicable||Unknown, considered a common annual breeder in Kejimkujik.||This species is regularly detected during forest bird monitoring in Kejimkujik. In 2013 this species was observed at 22 of 50 point counts (44%).||Kejimkujik represents a stronghold for this species in the greater ecosystem and is considered to be a relatively common annual breeder in park. Continue to protect and maintain habitat.|
|Eastern Moose (Mainland Population)||1) Maintain and enhance the current population and distribution; 2) Mitigate threats (where possible) that limit recovery; 3) Initiate research to address priority knowledge gaps; 4) Maintain and enhance habitat.||No objective established: status in Kejimkujik poorly understood.||Estimated declines since 1985.||Incidentally monitored through park staff and visitor observation cards. There have been 95 recorded sightings of Mainland Moose since 1967 (38 in the last 10 years). The most recent records are from 2015.||Continue to protect and maintain habitat. Individuals from the Tobeatic Wilderness Area population likely enter on the remote western side of Kejimkujik.|
Appendix B: Conservation and recovery measures that will be conducted by KNP and NHS
|Species||Ecosystem||Measure number||Measure||Desired outcome||Threat or recovery measure addressedTable note6||Timeline|
|Blanding’s Turtle||Wetland Ecosystem||1||Mitigate threats to Blanding's Turtles in Kejimkujik through the nest protection program (predators, flooding) and road mortality mitigation measures (speed reduction, signage, education).||Decreased nest loss; reduction of mortality; increased awareness amongst road users about risks to turtles.||Undertake recovery actions to increase recruitment or decrease mortality.||Annual (2016-2020)|
|Blanding’s Turtle||Wetland Ecosystem||2||Conduct systematic trapping and visual surveys in Kejimkujik to locate juvenile and adult Blanding's Turtles and assess survivorship and recovery.||Long-term monitoring measure tied to Kejimkujik’s Blanding’s Turtle Ecological Integrity monitoring measure. Data compiled in the central turtle database and periodically used to update the population viability analysis.||Conduct strategic monitoring of the population complex and continue to reassess and update population models.||Annual (2016-2020)|
|Blanding’s Turtle||Wetland Ecosystem||3||Photo document nesting site habitat over time to ensure that existing and emerging threats to nesting habitat are being identified and adequately mitigated.||Documentation of habitat changes to nesting beaches over time in Kejimkujik, following the developed protocol.||Knowledge gaps: habitat trends and threats, introduced species, climate change.||Annual (2016-2020)|
|Blanding’s Turtle||Wetland Ecosystem||4||Facilitate genetic analysis by collecting scute clipping samples during ongoing monitoring and research.||Further understanding of genetics to fill knowledge gaps.||Knowledge gaps: effective population size.||Annual (2016-2020)|
|Blanding’s Turtle, Eastern Ribbonsnake||Wetland Ecosystem||5||Monitor for alien invasive fish (Smallmouth Bass, Chain Pickerel) and develop a response plan as required.||Maintain freshwater ecosystems that are free of alien invasive species.||Introduction/establishment of exotic predatory fish.||2014-2017|
|Eastern Ribbonsnake||Wetland Ecosystem||6||Mitigate risks to ribbonsnakes at known sites.||Minimize incidental injury or mortality.||Disturbance or mortality by vehicles or machinery.||Annual (2016-2020)|
|Blanding's Turtle, Snapping Turtle, Common Nighthawk||Wetland Ecosystem||7||Reduce predation by hyperabundant wildlife (i.e. raccoons, red squirrels) through improved food and garbage storage and by park visitors.||Visitors aware of their potential impact on wildlife. Increased compliance with campground rules and regulations.||Changes in predator populations resulting from human activities.||Annual (2016-2020)|
|Snapping Turtle||Wetland Ecosystem||8||Opportunistically cover nests along roadside and beaches as observed.||Decreased nest predation.||Excessive predation.||Annual (2016-2020)|
|Piping Plover||Coastal Ecosystem||9||Reduce human disturbance on nesting beaches. Continue education and enforcement to ensure compliance with existing park regulations that help protect plovers.||Maintain at least 4 nesting pairs at Kejimkujik Seaside and a productivity of ≥1.65 chicks fledged per territorial pair (calculated as a 5-year running average).||Human disturbance during the nesting season from recreational beach use and vehicles.||Annual (2016-2020)|
|Piping Plover||Coastal Ecosystem||10||Enhance Piping Plover breeding habitat as required (nesting habitat, reduction of perches, etc.).||Increased and/or maintained amount of suitable nesting habitat for Piping Plovers at St. Catherine’s River beach.||Habitat loss or degradation. Ensure enough suitable habitat to meet population objectives.||As required (2016-2020)|
|Piping Plover||Coastal Ecosystem||11||Contribute to regional monitoring and research initiatives including documenting evidence of predation at each life stage, recording stewardship indicators, and documenting marked birds during breeding and migration.||Knowledge gaps reduced, regional reporting and partnerships continued.||Knowledge gaps: migratory movements, predation.||Annual (2016-2020)|
|Vole Ears Lichen, Blue Felt Lichen||Coastal Ecosystem||12||Complete population and distribution inventory work at Kejimkujik Seaside to assess extent and occurrence of rare lichens.||Increased knowledge of rare lichen distribution at Kejimkujik Seaside.||Knowledge gaps: refine population size and distribution information.||2017|
|Barn Swallow||Forest Ecosystem||13||Place and maintain nest boxes at selected current and historical Barn Swallow locations in Kejimkujik.||Reduce disturbance and provide nesting habitat for successful nesting of the Barn Swallow.||Habitat loss and degradation on the breeding grounds.||2018|
|Black Ash||Forest Ecosystem||14||Inventory distribution of Black Ash occurrences in park through compilation of observation records, traditional ecological knowledge, and surveys of potential habitat.||Improved knowledge of Black Ash distribution in Kejimkujik.||Knowledge gap: knowledge of Black Ash distribution in the park.||2018|
|Water Pennywort, Long's Bulrush||Freshwater Ecosystem||15||Complete the Atlantic Coastal Plain Flora (ACPF) Atlas on Kejimkujik Lake to complete population mapping on lakes listed as High Priority in the Recovery Strategy.||Rare Atlantic Coastal Plan Flora occurrences documented and mapped around the shoreline of Kejimkujik Lake.||Knowledge gap: Location of populations and suitable habitat at all High Priority locations.||2017|
|Water Pennywort||Freshwater Ecosystem||16||Seasonally protect Water Pennywort in the Jeremy's Bay campground using signs and barriers.||Reduced trampling by park visitors in campground locations where Water Pennywort occurs.||Trampling.||Annual (2016-2020)|
|All species||All Ecosystems||17||Continue to involve the public in meaningful recovery actions for species at risk through collaboration with the Kejimkujik volunteer program (recruitment, training, support, capacity, recognition).||Engagement of volunteers in hands-on recovery actions that benefit species at risk and provide memorable and empowering experiences.||Various threats.||Annual (2016-2020)|
|Monarch||All Ecosystems||18||Continue Kejimkujik's tagging program and continue to promote the creation of butterfly gardens through |
|Contribution towards the understanding of Monarch migration pathways. Encouragement of the creation of chemical-free butterfly gardens.||Various threats.||Annual (2016-2020)|
Appendix C: Other conservation and recovery measures that will be encouraged through partnerships or when additional resources become available
|Species||Ecosystem||Measure number||Measure||Desired outcome||Threat or recovery measure addressedTable note7|
|Blanding’s Turtle||Wetland Ecosystem||19||Continue tracking studies of hatchlings and young juveniles to better understand their seasonal movements, survivorship and distribution. Track females to locate new nesting sites and evaluate the need for nest protection efforts.||Increased knowledge of the survivorship rates of hatchlings and juveniles, seasonal movements, and habitat requirements.||Knowledge gaps: Determine the extent of the range and identify population status, structure, habitat use, and threats. Collect data necessary to assess the effectiveness of recovery actions.|
|Blanding’s Turtle||Wetland Ecosystem||20||Assess the effectiveness of the turtle headstarting program.||Data has been compiled and analyzed and the effectiveness of the turtle headstarting program determined. Recommendations made for improvements if necessary.||Knowledge gaps: Effects of headstarting on fitness.|
|Eastern Ribbonsnake||Wetland Ecosystem||21||Investigate methods to overcome monitoring and research challenges (tracking movements, marking, etc.).||Efficient methods to track and identify individual ribbonsnakes, determined and employed.||Knowledge gaps: Lack of information on extent of overland movements and other connections between concentration sites.|
|Eastern Ribbonsnake||Wetland Ecosystem||22||Locate and characterize the habitat of juveniles and adults and increase understanding of seasonal movements.||Key habitat requirements and seasonal movement patterns identified and used to inform threat mitigation and critical habitat identification.||Knowledge gaps: Lack of information on extent of overland movements and other connections between concentration sites.|
|Canada Warbler, Olive-sided Flycatcher, Rusty Blackbird, Common Nighthawk||Forest Ecosystem||23||Conduct surveys to determine the extent and occurrence of at-risk birds at Kejimkujik Seaside.||Increased knowledge of at-risk bird distribution at Kejimkujik Seaside.||Knowledge gaps: Monitoring and research to determine distribution.|
|Little Brown Myotis, Northern Myotis, Tri-colored Bat||Forest Ecosystem||24||Assess distribution and relative abundance of bat species in Kejimkujik and compare with baseline data collected in the early 2000s.||Understanding of distribution and status of bat species in Kejimkujik is increased.||Knowledge gap: Clarify population status in Kejimkujik using the baseline data from the early 2000s.|
|Black Ash||Forest Ecosystem||25||Investigate the need to protect Black Ash seedlings from impacts of ungulate herbivory (e.g., exclosures and/or enclosures).||Threats to Black Ash recruitment reduced. Number of seedlings protected.||Knowledge gap: Grazing impacts on seedling survival.|
|All species||All Ecosystems||26||Develop and promote a standardized species observation reporting system for park staff, volunteers, and visitors||Park staff and visitors easily reporting and sharing sighting information. Up to date database of species observations available.||Knowledge gaps: Distribution and occurrence of species at risk in Kejimkujik.|
Appendix D: Outreach, education and visitor experience measures related to species at risk in KNP and NHS
|MeasureTable note8||Measure number||Desired outcome||Proposed MeasuresTable note9|
|Encourage and include local Mi'kmaq of Nova Scotia in species at risk (SAR) recovery efforts.||1||Local Mi’kmaq are involved in species at risk recovery.|
|Promote species at risk messaging through news media, web content, social media and the Kejimkujik visitor guide.||2||Media content developed and shared.|
|Collaborate with recovery teams and partners to support an ecosystem based approach to recovery, and on projects that are beneficial to recovery in Kejimkujik.||3||Collaboration, efficiencies and sharing are fostered.|
|Participate in sharing circles and cultural retreats with interested Mi’kmaw people, to discuss and exchange knowledge about species at risk.||4||Knowledge is shared in non-conventional ways and understanding between different communities and organizations is increased.|
|Highlight Kejimkujik's significance as a National Historic Site by addressing culturally significant species at risk.||5||Park visitors understand connections between culturally important species at risk and Kejimkujik’s role as a cultural and natural environment.|
|Incorporate species at risk messaging and monitoring into interpretive programming, products, and special events||6||Park visitors are increasingly aware of species at risk in Kejimkujik and how they can help with protection and recovery.|
Appendix E: Effects on the Environment and Other Species
A strategic environmental assessment (SEA) is conducted on all SARA recovery planning documents, in accordance with the Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals. The purpose of a SEA is to incorporate environmental considerations into the development of public policies, plans, and program proposals to support environmentally sound decision-making and to evaluate whether the outcomes of a recovery planning document could affect any component of the environment or achievement of any of the Federal Sustainable Development Strategy’s (FSDS) goals and targets.
Recovery planning is intended to benefit species at risk and biodiversity in general. However, it is recognized that recovery measures may also inadvertently lead to environmental effects beyond the intended benefits. The planning process, which is based on national guidelines, directly incorporates consideration of all environmental effects, with a particular focus on possible impacts on non-target species or habitats. The results of the SEA are incorporated directly into the plan itself, and are summarized below.
Overall, it is anticipated that implementation of this action plan will have a beneficial impact on non-target species, ecological processes, and the environment in Kejimkujik. This plan puts into practice measures presented in recovery strategies for some of the species at risk in this plan, which were subject to SEAs during the development of those documents. Further, this action plan was developed to benefit all species at risk that regularly occur in Kejimkujik. Consequently all of these species were considered in the planning process, any potential secondary effects were evaluated and mitigated, and, where appropriate, measures were designed to benefit multiple species. The planning process was also guided by priorities identified in the ecological integrity monitoring program at Kejimkujik and by the park management plan (Parks Canada Agency, 2010). As a result, measures outlined in this plan address key management priorities aimed at improving the broader ecological health of Kejimkujik. Finally, this plan outlines stewardship measures, educational programs, volunteer opportunities, and awareness initiatives involving park visitors, local residents, Indigenous organizations, and the general public. This will lead to greater appreciation, understanding, and action towards the conservation and recovery of species at risk in general.
- Date Modified: